You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 293 words from this article are provided below; about 563 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.2 | The History Cooperative
107.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Canada and the United States


Rogan Kersh. Dreams of a More Perfect Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2001. Pp. xi, 358. $39.95.

Rogan Kersh provides an insightful history of the concept of "union" in American political and popular discourse. As even the most cursory glance at nineteenth-century politics would demonstrate, union has been among the most important and contested concepts in American politics. The concept of union does not fit neatly into the standard liberal and republican paradigms that have framed much of the scholarship on American political thought over the past few decades, however. As a consequence, union has received substantially less attention than such equally vital concepts as "liberty," "equality," "community," or "virtue." 1
     As Kersh amply demonstrates, the scholarly oversight of union has been unfortunate. Understanding the concept of union is essential to understanding American politics from before the American Revolution until well after Reconstruction. Moreover, Kersh's careful history shows that the concept of union illuminates a surprisingly large number of issues in American political development. 2
     In order to trace the history of the idea of union in America, Kersh employs various methods. His innovative starting point is a quantitative coding of a large sample of American newspapers between 1750 and 1900, supplemented with diaries, congressional debates, and presidential speeches. The book is not organized around this quantitative data, but the database helps to provide a graphic overview of the usage of the term and a helpful starting point for the analysis. The bulk of the book shifts expertly from broad-ranging discussions of this primary data, to close textual analyses of such leading figures in American political thought as Daniel Webster, Frederick Douglass, and Abraham Lincoln, to lessons drawn from a vast secondary literature. . . .


There are about 563 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.