You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 179 words from this article are provided below; about 496 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.2 | The History Cooperative
107.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Canada and the United States


Robert Lewis. Manufacturing Montreal: The Making of an Industrial Landscape, 1850 to 1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2000. Pp. xvii, 336. $45.00.

Robert Lewis sets out to challenge the dominant interpretation of urban historiography that posits that residential and industrial centralization was mainly a middle-class phenomenon, and that working-class suburbanization was relatively unimportant before the end of the 1930s. Lewis accomplishes this objective by chronicling the historical geography of Montreal's manufacturing districts between 1890 and 1929. Lewis argues that the city's manufacturing and working-class districts were constructed as a response by business elites to the needs of manufacturers to implement new economies of scale, new technologies of production, and new labor processes in new spaces. Case studies of several of the city's important industries illuminate the dynamics underlying the locational decisions of manufacturers. Lewis uncovers the inter-firm and inter-industry connections in the formation of manufacturing districts that laid the basis for the development of both central and suburban manufacturing districts in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. . . .


There are about 496 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.