You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 202 words from this article are provided below; about 444 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.1 | The History Cooperative
107.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Canada and the United States


Kurt Hackemer. The U.S. Navy and the Origins of the Military-Industrial Complex, 1847–1883. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press. 2001. Pp. x, 181. $45.00.

Sociologist C. Wright Mills first suggested the concept of an economic-military alliance in his The Power Elite (1956). A few years later, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned that a military-industrial complex (MIC) might pose a danger to American society and politics. The idea of an MIC became the central assumption during the 1960s for Samuel P. Huntington, Fred J. Cook, Walter Millis, and other scholars of American military history, civil-military relations, and the political economy of warfare. Revisionist historians of the 1970s adopted the MIC as the central institution to explain the intimate influence of great defense industries in advancing an imperialistic foreign policy. They found the origin of the so-called military industrial complex in the late nineteenth century with the growth of large-scale industry. Historian Benjamin Franklin Cooling revealed in Gray Steel and Blue Water Navy: The Formative Years of America's Military-Industrial Complex, 1881–1917 (1979) the intimate partnership between the steel industry and the U.S. Navy in promoting a deep-water fleet, domestic steel industry, and expansionist foreign policy. . . .


There are about 444 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.