You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 274 words from this article are provided below; about 520 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 107.1 | The History Cooperative
107.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Comparative/World


Robert Bickers. Britain in China: Community, Culture and Colonialism 1900–1949. (Studies in Imperialism.) New York: Manchester University Press; distributed by St. Martin's, New York. 1999. Pp. xii, 276. Cloth $79.95, paper $29.95.

This mature and insightful volume could be considered under various rubrics: British history; Chinese history (was the knockoff British Raj in China a small scale successor to Mongol and Manchu regimes?); history of imperialism; and cultural history—not to mention "readable books to recommend to friends and students." The focus is not on institutional or diplomatic history, although there is substantial use of the literature in these fields, nor yet on political imperialism as such, although that context is also well sketched. Instead, we look at how the British cultural and political "presence" in China worked. Territorially, this presence comprised two British-dominated international settlements (Shanghai and Tianjin), the crown colony of Hong Kong, two leased territories, six concessions, and diverse outlying commercial or missionary networks reaching from Manchuria to Burma. The settler community of Shanghai was the spiritual capital, and "Shanghailanders" developed sweet self-important dreams of their own significance for Britain, China, and civilization, all to be defended by pomp and force. By the 1920s, however, Shanghai was caught between Chinese nationalism and British national interest, neither of which could tolerate a racist, blinkered Shanghai-stan whose constabulary fired into Chinese crowds, endangering sales, imperial prestige, and diplomacy. Ironically, Shanghailanders and testy anti-imperialists shared heroic myths of a roaring imperial lion that respectively either woke or raped the sleeping dragon. Robert Bickers's story carefully shows how fleeting and circumstantial was the effect of this "mock Raj" (p. 219). . . .


There are about 520 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.