| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 225 words from this article are provided below; about 548 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.5 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Canada and the United States

Isabelle Lehuu. Carnival on the Page: Popular Print Media in Antebellum America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 2000. Pp. xi, 244. Cloth $39.95, paper $17.95.

In this informed, thoughtful study of American antebellum print culture, Isabelle Lehuu considers some of the popular materials circulated between 1832 and the Panic of 1857. She is interested in the outpouring of uncopyrighted, non-book artifacts, which she interprets as signifying a transient, unique era of festive abundance. Combining Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of carnival as a licensed disruption of established norms with Victor Turner's theory of liminality, and applying this amalgam to the history of the book, Lehuu sees antebellum print culture as a carnivalesque disruption of the disciplinary, authoritarian culture of book learning. 1

She proposes that the proliferation of such ephemera as penny newspapers, mammoth-sized weeklies, gift book annuals, and ladies' magazines aimed to please rather than instruct a white population that was both newly literate and newly urban. Technological efficiencies of paper making, printing, and distributing allowed for large-scale production of inexpensive print objects but dictated neither the content of such objects nor the uses they would serve. Rather than being transformed by print into prudent, self-governing citizens—as republican ideology assumed would be the case—antebellum readers transformed print itself into a raucously transgressive cultural arena. . . .

There are about 548 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.