You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 206 words from this article are provided below; about 523 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Methods/Theory



Bouda Etemad. La Possession du monde: Poids et mesures de la colonisation (XVIIIe-XXe siècles). (Questions à l'Histoire.) Paris and Bruxelles: Èditions Complexe. 2000. Pp. 351. 139fr, 898 F.

The historiography of colonialism is huge. Why, asks Bouda Etemad in the introduction to his new synthesis, should another stone be added to an already imposing edifice? First, he argues, there are still gaps in the factual record. Second, current hopes and uncertainties prompt us to ask new questions of the past. Last, the sheer import of colonialism for the making of the modern world demands works of synthesis and global studies privileging the longue durée and comparative analysis. Does his book justify itself in these terms? Broadly, yes. It fills factual gaps by quantifying the territorial extent of the overseas colonial empires at different points in time—and the cost in European and non-European lives of acquiring them by conquest. There are no estimates of colonial trade or the contribution of colonial inputs to the material resources of the metropolitan powers, which seems a strange omission in a synthesis of this kind. Nevertheless, the data Etemad has compiled in "taking colonialism's measure" will prove useful to students and teachers alike. . . .


There are about 523 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.