You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 239 words from this article are provided below; about 515 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Karen Ordahl Kupperman. Indians and English: Facing Off in Early America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2000. Pp. xi, 297. Cloth $45.00, paper $17.95.

This book deals with interaction between English colonists and North American Indians ("Americans") from the Roanoke settlement to the mid-seventeenth century. Karen Ordahl Kupperman is particularly struck that both sides "naturally sought to incorporate" the other "into their own systems" (p. 1). Although she avoids direct disagreement with other scholars, the author builds on her earlier work to challenge much received opinion. It is not true, she believes, that "American life was egalitarian and native political systems were consensual at the time of contact" (p. 38). The early colonists did not "dismiss the American natives as negligible or as cultureless savages" (p. 2). Nor did they denigrate them as racially inferior: "race . . . came later" (p. 75). Nor is it true that they "wished to sweep the Indians out of the way and did so without qualms" (p. 213). 1
     Kupperman contends that "modern authors who portray the English as overconfident imperialists" rely uncritically on "clear and striking" epithets written by those who never left England (p. 11). Those who came to the colonies wrote more knowingly, and very ambivalently. Buffeted by rushes of fear and hope, their accounts oscillated accordingly. A brief report could be "contemptuous and admiring, hostile and friendly, self-confident and terrified" (p. x). . . .


There are about 515 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.