You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 309 words from this article are provided below; about 562 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Asia



Adeeb Khalid. The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. (Comparative Studies on Muslim Societies, number 27.) Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1998. Pp. xx, 335. Cloth $55.00, paper $22.00.

Modernizing and reformist trends appeared in several parts of the Islamic world in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, mostly under the impact, direct or indirect, of contacts with European colonial empires. Notable examples are to be found in the history of Iran and the Ottoman lands, as well as of Muslim peoples under British, French, and Dutch rule. Such movements have received substantial scholarly attention in recent years. A similar phenomenon occurred in Central Asia, which was incorporated into the tsarist empire in the second half of the nineteenth century. The latter development, however, has been largely neglected. This is not entirely surprising. The reformist movement here was quite short-lived and fragmented. It had very little infrastructural support, emerging in the face of considerable opposition from the local rulers, the colonial administration, and conservative Muslim clerics. Under these conditions, it is not surprising that it had scarcely progressed beyond a rudimentary level when it was abruptly terminated by the imposition of Soviet rule in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Thereafter, Soviet scholars either ignored the history of Muslim reform in Central Asia or depicted it in a wholly negative light. Researchers from the West (very few scholars from Islamic countries evinced any interest in this subject) had almost no first-hand access to primary sources from the period and were thus unable to present a convincing alternative interpretation. Also, they tended to examine this episode mainly in the light of Central Asian-Russian confrontation, with very little understanding of the broader context of social and economic ferment in the region. Consequently, their analysis was almost always very superficial. . . .


There are about 562 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.