You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 174 words from this article are provided below; about 679 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Asia



Matthew H. Sommer. Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China. (Law, Society, and Culture in China.) Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2000. Pp. xvi, 413. $55.00.

During the last decade, an intellectual earthquake has rumbled through Chinese legal history. Aptly, its epicenter has been Los Angeles, where a number of scholars and graduate students in the history department at the University of California, Los Angeles—Matthew H. Sommer among them—have managed to shake the foundations of decades of received wisdom about Chinese law, particularly during the Qing dynasty (1644-1911). Whereas previous legal scholarship on Chinese law focused on criminal law, and the near absence of litigation in civil matters, thanks to this new scholarship we now know that civil law was also important, that ordinary people frequently sued on another, and that lively debates took place about the role of law in politics and society. In China, as in the West, law was used, abused, and contested. The idea of Chinese as nonlitigious "consensus-seekers" can be safely laid to rest. . . .


There are about 679 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.