You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 138 words from this article are provided below; about 440 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, . | The History Cooperative
.  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Methods/Theory



Shepard Krech III. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: W. W. Norton. 1999. Pp. 318. $27.95.

In this provocative study, the anthropologist Shepard Krech III seeks "to determine the extent to which Indians were ecologists and conservationists (as is commonly understood today)" (p. 212). As Krech has phrased the question, the answer can only be negative. In a book impressively grounded in anthropological and historical literature on Indian resource use, Krech argues that Indians were poor conservationists because, among other reasons, their local economies took little account of larger environments, and their hunting cultures encouraged as well as restrained the harvesting of game. The behavior of Indian hunters bore little resemblance to the culturally idealized image of the "ecological Indian," an image that Krech roundly (and rightly) criticizes as "dehumanizing" (p. 26). . . .


There are about 440 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.