|
|
|
Review Essays Seeing Like a State
| The following
essays address the issues raised in Seeing Like a State:
How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed,
a recent book by James C. Scott, a scholar who holds
a joint appointment in anthropology and political science at Yale
University and who has written extensively on issues of power and
resistance in Southeast Asia. His departmental affiliations notwithstanding,
Scott is a scholar whose work has frequently had considerable influence
in several disciplines other than his own, including history. And
in spite of his longstanding concern with Southeast Asia, his works
have helped shape the agendas of many researchers working on other
parts of the world. To cite but two examples, within Chinese studies
his comments on the "moral economy of the peasant" have generated
considerable debate, while within Latin American studies his arguments
about "everyday forms of resistance" have been taken up and applied
by a variety of specialists. Scott's work on the "hidden transcripts"
that protesters in varied contexts follow when challenging the power
of elites has similarly proved inspiringor provoked criticismamong
humanists and social scientists. Seeing Like a State is his
latest and in some ways most ambitiously wide-ranging work, which
seeks to do nothing less than provide us with a new way of thinking
about the political dimensions of "high modernity," especially the
tendency for regimes of this period to try to remold society in
particular ways. Scott argues that there are more similarities than
has sometimes been admitted between the activities of modern states
associated with disparate ideologies. His claim is that there were
important homologies between many twentieth-century government systems,
especially in the high value placed on utopian projects and the
low value accorded to local knowledge. The three scholars who comment
on Scott's book combine an appreciation for some of its insights
with attention to aspects of its argument that they see as either
undeveloped or problematic. Jane Caplan is a specialist in
German history, Morton Keller specializes in the history
of the United States, and Fernando Coronil is an anthropologist
and specialist in Latin American history. |
1 |
|
|
LOCKSS system has permission to collect, preserve, and serve this Archival Unit
Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for
personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce,
publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or
sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any
way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part
without the written permission of the copyright holder.
|