You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 127 words from this article are provided below; about 518 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.4 | The History Cooperative
105.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Michael D. Pearlman. Warmaking and American Democracy: The Struggle over Military Strategy, 1700 to the Present. (Modern War Studies.) Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 1999. Pp. ix, 441. $45.00.

With this impressive volume, Michael D. Pearlman adds to the rich and provocative Modern War Studies series of the University Press of Kansas. In fewer than 400 pages, he covers the vicissitudes of formulating military strategy in America's "pluralist democracy" from colonial times through Vietnam and beyond. An unstable and unpredictable civilian "triad"—president, Congress, and the public—complicates the conduct of war, Pearlman argues, by denying the armed services central and consistent direction. Pearlman's ambitious volume is based primarily on secondary sources, and he uses an abbreviated endnote structure. . . .


There are about 518 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.