You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 250 words from this article are provided below; about 549 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.3 | The History Cooperative
105.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Mark E. Kann. A Republic of Men: The American Founders, Gendered Language, and Patriarchal Politics. New York: New York University Press. 1998. Pp. x, 237. Cloth $55.00, paper $18.50.

Mark E. Kann notes that American boys arrange themselves into a pecking order. Some demand obedience; some acquiesce in these demands; and some boys are tormented as losers—"nerds," "geeks," "sissies"—whose visible humiliation helps ensure the submission of the others. When these boys grow up, they endorse a similar hierarchy of manliness, and thus does hegemonic masculinity perpetuate itself, usually at the expense of most men and of nearly all women. 1
     How did this come to be? 2
     Kann finds abundant evidence in the writings and oratory of the founding fathers, who seemed obsessively concerned with defining and enshrining manhood. On the eve of the American Revolution, Thomas Paine, like many others, denounced those who counseled peace as unmanly: "You are unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend, and lover" (p. 41). Benjamin Franklin disdained the persistent bachelor as "half a man" (p. 59). "Every man that really is a man," he added, must be "master of his own family" (p. 7). Alexander Hamilton urged President John Adams to exhibit "manly but calm and sedate firmness" (p. 111). Some of Kann's abundant references are striking, such as the words of a debtor, pleading to President Thomas Jefferson for his release: "This ignominious imprisonment unmans the heart" (p. 74). . . .


There are about 549 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.