You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 292 words from this article are provided below; about 549 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 105.1 | The History Cooperative
105.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
February, 2000
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Elaine Forman Crane. Ebb Tide in New England: Women, Seaports, and Social Change, 1630–1800. Boston: Northeastern University Press. 1998. Pp. x, 333. Cloth $50.00, paper $17.95.

What, Elaine Forman Crane asks, was the impact of an increasingly female population in the cities of colonial New England? Her surprising verdict is that increased numbers led to decreased power. Starting in Europe and including African-American and Native American examples, Crane concludes the story was one of decline. She accordingly swings the historiographic pendulum back from female agency in a patriarchal world to female victimization by a patriarchal world. In fact, stressing female agency, Crane claims, "lets patriarchy off the hook" (p. 3) and even "distorts history" (p. 4). 1
     Crane finds a great deal of evidence in her sources that stubbornly refuses to conform to her paradigm. Such things she labels "puzzling" (p. 155), "rather surprising" (p. 219), an "irony" (p. 170), or a "curious exception" (p. 123). I would like to propose that what appears paradoxical may in fact reflect a more complex truth. The first sentence of the prologue states that "this is a book about today" (p. 3) because female urban poverty is still with us. I think this statement reflects a common tendency to look at the colonial past through modern eyes. Historical lives can be poorly interpreted using our own sense of what we would prefer as women in the present. For example, we look at institutions of colonial America and find women absent. We then make the assumption that women would have wanted to be present. The logical conclusion, therefore, is that women felt excluded or even victimized. Are we really sure this kind of formulation is appropriate? . . .


There are about 549 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.