|
|
|
Book Review
Asia
Mark Edward Lewis. Writing and Authority in Early China. (SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture.) Albany: State University of New York Press. 1999. Pp. vii, 544.
|
"This book is about the uses of writing to command assent and obedience in early China" (p. 1), here defined as roughly the last half-millennium B.C. Literature is, in fact, central to traditional Chinese civilization, to an extent that it is often difficult for us fully to appreciate. As Mark Edward Lewis notes, this was a society whose officials came to be systematically selected for their mastery of classic texts, whose fine arts were dominated by the ink and writing brush of the scholar, and whose urban landscape was liberally festooned with written signs and inscriptions. This book addresses a vitally important issue. |
1 |
|
For Lewis, the importance of writing to the Chinese Empire was less a matter of its practical administrative utility than of the parallel, "virtual," empire-of-the-mind it encouraged in the imagination. Universal elite commitment to a shared body of texts cemented together an empire twice the size of Europe, for two thousand years, with only the weakest of coercive machinery. Such idealized texts as the Zhou li (Rituals of Zhou) legitimated the imperial order and provided a model for successive dynastic regenerations along perpetually identical lines. |
. . . |
There are about 525 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|