You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 339 words from this article are provided below; about 737 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 104.5 | The History Cooperative
104.5  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 1999
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review

Methods/Theory



Ruth Roach Pierson and Nupur Chaudhuri, editors. Nation, Empire, Colony: Historicizing Gender and Race. Assisted by Beth McAuley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1998. Pp. viii, 314. Cloth $29.95, paper $14.95.

This is a lively and interesting book that will attract readers from a variety of fields concerned with the history of gender. The able introduction by Ruth Roach Pierson runs through the major developments in the histories of women, imperialism (interpreted by editors Pierson and Nupur Chaudhuri in its widest sense), and nationalism and situates the subsequent essays effectively for novice readers. For scholars familiar with studies in feminist and postcolonial historiography, the introduction reminds one why such work is still so necessary. The range of case studies offered requires most to read outside their areas of specialization: few scholars are expert in the histories of colonization, anti-imperialism, and nationalism specific to Iran, Japan, India, Canada, Ireland, and France—to name just a few of the territories covered by contributors. Those concerned with the ways that gender intersects with discourses of race, ethnicity, nation, and class will find much to interest them in the different examples discussed. An enquiring engagement with feminist historiography permeates the book, which originated in a conference of the International Federation for Research in Women's History. I was surprised to find several writers still positioning themselves against an earlier moment in imperial and women's historiography in which women travellers and pioneers were deemed to be outside the evils of racism and imperialism, but perhaps what passes for orthodoxy in cultural studies is still a very vibrant opposition viewpoint in some fields of history. All the contributors to this volume are specifically concerned with how discourses of nation are gendered and with how gender identities are racialized. The value of the book lies in the contrasts among different case studies, whose cumulative evidence of the endlessly variable interplay of gender and imperialism effectively steers the reader away from constructing any unifying narrative of gender, imperial, or postcolonial experience and identity. . . .


There are about 737 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.