You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 289 words from this article are provided below; about 636 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 104.4 | The History Cooperative
104.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 1999
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Timothy Messer-Kruse. The Yankee International: Marxism and the American Reform Tradition, 1848–1876. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1998. Pp. xi, 319. Cloth $55.00, paper $18.95.

Nearly a century ago, Werner Sombart asked, "Why is there no socialism in the United States?" Sombart and historians following his lead have rightly pointed to the effects of racial, ethnic, and religious divisiveness, waves of immigration, high living standards, the two-party system, the ideal of social mobility, liberal democracy, and outright repression of organized labor. Without dismissing their significance, Timothy Messer-Kruse interestingly turns from these broader issues to the internecine wrangling among American radicals. His case study focuses on the International Workingman's Party, whose troubled existence from 1864–1874 foreshadowed much of the ideological discord that continues to bedevil the American left. 1
     With a solid grounding in primary sources, Messer-Kruse argues that the American reform tradition and European Marxism were ultimately antagonistic despite common concerns. The diverse cultural agenda of the former was often at odds with the single-minded theoretical imperative of the latter. Antebellum reform in the United States by 1850 embraced a diffused egalitarianism, which contemporaries called a sisterhood of reforms. Often configured together were abolitionism, temperance, feminism, spiritualism, vegetarianism, hydrotherapy, educational innovation, land reform, anticlericalism, and various utopian inclinations. Many paths, it was thought, led to the same destination. A core value was the sovereignty of the individual, an inheritance with republican, liberal, and antinomian roots. The failure of moral suasion alone, however, to eradicate social evils by midcentury led many reformers to turn to government to correct abuses, whether in personal liberty laws, temperance legislation, divorce reform, debtor relief, regulation of life insurance, or creation of asylums. . . .


There are about 636 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.