You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 299 words from this article are provided below; about 572 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 104.3 | The History Cooperative
104.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 1999
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 
Order this book
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Alison M. Parker. Purifying America: Women, Cultural Reform, and Pro-Censorship Activism, 1873–1933. (Women in American History.) Champaign: University of Illinois Press. 1997. Pp. xii, 286. Cloth $42.50, paper $16.95.

Alison M. Parker focuses on the Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) in an effort to revise historical understandings of censorship in the United States. She maintains that most prior histories, written primarily by committed civil libertarians, have portrayed a "Whiggish" progression from nineteenth-century repression to late twentieth-century tolerance. Disproportionately emphasizing Anthony Comstock and his closest collaborators, they have mischaracterized the pro-censorship movement in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as a small group of elite white males whose Victorian prudery generated an obsessive crusade against various forms of sexual expression. As an unfortunate result, they have overlooked the extent to which the American middle class supported censorship as part of a more general confidence that government regulation could promote constructive social change and, ultimately, democratic harmony. 1
     While situating the WCTU in the mainstream of middle-class Progressive reform, Parker also emphasizes its distinctive reliance, as the largest women's organization in the country, on its maternal role in protecting children, and society generally, from dangerous influences. Maternal activism linked the WCTU's censorship efforts with its more famous campaign for temperance. As mothers and as Progressives, Parker observes, members of the WCTU worried more about immorality and impurity than about Comstock's narrower obsession with obscenity. Frequently invoking metaphors of disease, they asserted that words and images harm individual character, and that novels, journalism, art, and movies about drunkennness, sexual misconduct, and violence cause the immoral activities they depict. The WCTU used the language of science and social purity typical of Progressives to advocate censorship as a method of alleviating this contagion. . . .


There are about 572 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.