You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 250 words from this article are provided below; about 547 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.

If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:
• Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 106.4 | The History Cooperative
106.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2001
 
The American Historical Review

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Canada and the United States



Stephen Kantrowitz. Ben Tillman and the Reconstruction of White Supremacy. (The Fred W. Morrison Series in Southern Studies.) Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 2000. Pp. 422. Cloth $49.95, paper $19.95.

Benjamin Ryan Tillman, Jr., had a dream, and in that dream, white, male, landowning farmers (i.e. society's producers, in his view) held sway in their individual households and the wider world. In the last third of the nineteenth century, Tillman's dream was threatened by black voters, by renegade whites who helped to form interracial political coalitions, and by non-productive moneyed powers who colluded at the national level with federal authorities. Tillman spent his life fighting these enemies in words and deeds, both of which Stephen Kantrowitz carefully analyzes. The fight required a measure of reform, but Tillman was no radical, his biographer reminds us. Limited by his understanding of Reconstruction, which meant an alliance of inept black officials and traitorous whites kept in power by a tyrannical federal government, Tillman refused to join the Populist Party with its interracial overtones and federally sponsored subtreasury proposal. Instead, he seized on the free and unlimited coinage of silver as a panacea, and the most significant reforms that he achieved in South Carolina were a state liquor dispensary (established in 1892 and dispensed with by the state legislature in 1907), an agricultural and mechanical college for white males (Clemson University), and an industrial and normal school for white females (Winthrop College). . . .


There are about 547 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.