You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WMQ online. About 554 words from this article are provided below; about 8092 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the William and Mary Quarterly, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase this article in PDF form for $10.00.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the William and Mary Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the William and Mary Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Wesley J. Campbell | Sources and Interpretations: The French Intrigue of James Cole Mountflorence | The William and Mary Quarterly, LXV.4 | The History Cooperative
LXV.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2008
Previous
Next
The William and Mary Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 


 Sources and Interpretations


The French Intrigue of James Cole Mountflorence


Wesley J. Campbell



IN July 1793, less than three months after President George Washington had declared the United States impartial toward the conflict raging in Europe, French Minister Edmond-Charles-Édouard Genet tested America's incipient neutrality. With instructions from his government, Genet armed a French privateer in Philadelphia and simultaneously launched an offensive against Spanish Louisiana using disaffected American pioneers. The episode began on July 5, when Genet shared the French plans for western invasion in a private meeting with Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson. Ten days later Genet's agents departed for Kentucky to rendezvous with American Revolutionary War hero George Rogers Clark. The effort, though ultimately unsuccessful, was to be one of the most intriguing and contentious affairs in the history of the young Republic. 1
      As Washington's cabinet grappled with Genet's privateering escapades, details of French interest in the Spanish southwest also came to light. Following a meeting of the cabinet on July 18, 1793, Jefferson recorded: "Genl. Knox tells us Govr. Blount (now in town) has informed him that when Mt.florence was in France, certain members of the Execve. council enquired of him what were the dispositions of Cumbld. settlemt. &c. towards Spain? Mt.florce. told them unfriendly. They then offered him a commission to embody troops there, to give him a quantity of blank commissions to be filled up by him making officers of the republic of France those who should command, and undertaking to pay the expences. Mt.florce. desired his name might not be used." James Cole Mountflorence, the subject of Jefferson's note, had been sent to Paris in 1792 as a commercial and land agent for William Blount, governor of the territory that would soon become Tennessee. Jefferson's representation of the cabinet meeting, which has been cited by several historians of the American West, indicates that France approached an unreceptive Mountflorence in an attempt to gauge western opinion and gain his support for an effort to wrest Louisiana from Spanish control.1 A recently uncovered document in the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, shows that Mountflorence approached French authorities with plans for western intrigue, not vice versa. 2
      The proposal Mountflorence presented to the French government came at an opportune time. Already embroiled in war against Austria and Prussia in the fall of 1792, France faced a possible conflict with Spain as well. Mountflorence's letter to the French foreign minister called for French intrigue in Spanish Louisiana and a new treaty with the United States. Within a fortnight French leaders decided to send Genet on a strikingly similar mission. The resemblance and timing of this decision suggest that Mountflorence's proposal had an influence on French policy. The document also raises questions about Mountflorence's motivations. Why did a man who fought for American independence take steps that might have risked the neutrality of his government? The evidence suggests that Mountflorence was economically interested in freeing the Mississippi River from Spanish control, a move that would potentially have increased the value of his western land investments (Figure I). His self-interested scheme was, in this way, quite similar to other prominent western conspiracies. There is also a possibility that Mountflorence had accomplices. Particularly, Mountflorence's activity warrants a reexamination of Blount's role in the Genet affair. 3


 
Figure 1

    . . .


There are about 8092 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.