You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 216 words from this article are provided below; about 349 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 40.1 | The History Cooperative
40.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Spring, 2009
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



American Inquisition: The Hunt for Japanese American Disloyalty in World War II. By Eric L. Muller. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007. 197 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. $27.50.)

      In American Inquisition, Muller examines the conflicting processes of mid-level U. S. officials, who evaluated the loyalty of some 40,000 Japanese American internees during World War II. The mid-level officials assumed that disloyalty implied a danger to national security, yet evaluated loyalty under differing missions. The Japanese American Joint Board (JAJB), an investigative venture of the War Department and the Wartime Relocation Authority (WRA), was created to determine who could work for the war effort. Given this raison d'être, the JAJB developed racist and suspicious criteria, which determined that nearly a third of the internees evaluated were not fit for release. 1
      Although it participated in the JAJB, the WRA's specific mission was to intern and release Japanese Americans, and hence needed to prove that some internees were safe for release and that all others were being confined. The WRA dealt daily with the Japanese American internees and had to manage the controversies that were caused by loyalty investigations. With contact and a motivation to release internees, the WRA developed a less stringent set of criteria. . . .

There are about 349 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.