You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 142 words from this article are provided below; about 359 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 39.4 | The History Cooperative
39.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2008
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Kansas in the Great Depression: Work Relief, the Dole, and Rehabilitation. By Peter Fearon. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2007. xv + 316 pp. Tables, notes, bibliography, index. $44.95.)

      In this thoroughly researched and clearly written study, Peter Fearon, professor of history at the University of Leicester, describes and evaluates relief in Kansas during the Great Depression. The Sunflower State's administration of welfare is exceptionally well documented, due to the papers of John G. Stutz, the state's chief relief administrator. Fearon uses Stutz's papers, records of federal agencies, newspapers, and scholarly monographs to explore how Kansas and its counties implemented the New Deal. 1
      Fearon shows that welfare prior to the New Deal was poorly coordinated, inefficient, and unprofessional. The New Deal brought greater federal oversight that was warranted and "never oppressive" (p. 71). . . .

There are about 359 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.