You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 187 words from this article are provided below; about 412 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 34.4 | The History Cooperative
34.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2003
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century. By R. Douglas Hurt. (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002. xiii + 192 pp. Bibliographic essay, index. $24.95.)

      Uniformly praised on its dustcover by the nation's leading agricultural historians, this book delivers a tightly woven description of "commercially oriented farmers" who in the 1920s "climbed on the scientific and technological treadmill and then found they could not get off" (p. 51). 1
      In spite of many debates that might have lead to a different outcome, during the early years of the twentieth century, America's farmers "would finally recognize the value of organizing by commodity rather than by vocation or geography" (p. 58). In these commodity areas (i.e., rice, wheat, tobacco, corn, soybeans, peanut, and cotton) farmers organized politically to win federal legislation that established what they envisioned as a fair price (often described as "parity") for their crops. By the 1940s, these commodity producers "considered it an entitlement" to have these fair prices guaranteed by government, but groused about resulting federal farm programs that cost them their "freedom and independence." . . .

There are about 412 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.