You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 175 words from this article are provided below; about 365 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 34.4 | The History Cooperative
34.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Winter, 2003
Previous
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Amchitka and the Bomb: Nuclear Testing in Alaska. By Dean W. Kohlhoff. (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002. x + 166 pp. Map, notes, index. $25.00.)

      In Amchitka and the Bomb, Dean Kohlhoff offers an amazingly concise narrative that nonetheless deals with a wide array of issues associated with nuclear weapons testing, Alaskan history, and environmentalism. His work follows up Dan O'Neill's The Firecracker Boys (New York, 1994), which documented the eventually aborted effort to excavate a deepwater harbor in Alaska using nuclear explosions. In the 1960s and early 1970s, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) conducted three underground nuclear tests on the Aleutian island of Amchitka. The purpose of the first test, Long Shot (1965), was to provide data that would aid in differentiating between underground nuclear explosions and earthquakes, and thus provide a means of verifying compliance with a possible comprehensive test-ban treaty. The second and third shots, Milrow (1969) and Cannikin (1970), were part of the military's effort to develop an antiballistic missile defense system. . . .

There are about 365 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.