You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 146 words from this article are provided below; about 371 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 33.2 | The History Cooperative
33.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Summer, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Crimes against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation. By Karl Jacoby (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001. xix + 305 pp. Illustrations, maps, tables, notes, bibliography, index. $39.95, cloth; $26.95, paper.)

     Feasting on nature channels and weaned on Disney movies about wildlife, the American public often reacts (or overreacts) simplistically to the interactions of humans and animals throughout history. This is readily evident in perceptions about hunting and game laws, and the violation of those laws, or poaching. Distortions abound, so that even environmental historians who should know better assert that such ecological luminaries as Henry David Thoreau and Aldo Leopold either did not hunt or gave up hunting. For modern Americans, the moral lines about hunting and poaching seem clearly drawn and brook no ambiguity. In truth, the matter has always been morally complicated. . . .


There are about 371 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.