You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the WHQ online. About 206 words from this article are provided below; about 314 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Western Historical Quarterly, you can:
•  subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Western Historical Quarterly (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Western Historical Quarterly.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Western Historical Quarterly, 32.3 | The History Cooperative
32.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
Autumn, 2001
 
The Western Historical Quarterly

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


A Fateful Time: The Background and Legislative History of the Indian Reorganization Act. By Elmer R. Rusco. (Reno: University of Nevada Press, 2000. xv + 363 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $44.95.)

     The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934 ranks among the most important pieces of Indian legislation and is often depicted as the centerpiece of Commissioner John Collier's Indian New Deal. Although numerous studies have dealt with the measure, Rusco, a political scientist, claims that his book "provides a sounder base" for understanding the intent of the IRA and examines several issues that earlier works have overlooked or treated inadequately (p. 12). Rusco's study covers the background and passage of the IRA, not its subsequent impact. 1
     Rusco's background section touches on several important themes. He notes, for example, that numerous tribal governments still existed in the 1920s. The federal government, despite its policy of forced assimilation, sometimes worked with these local units and even formed new tribal governments when the need arose. Moreover, Rusco claims that court decisions gave existing tribal governments considerable legal jurisdiction. These views obviously conflict with the widespread belief that the federal government had destroyed tribal authority, and that the IRA filled a political vacuum. . . .


There are about 314 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.