|
|
|
Cornelia Bryce Pinchot and the Struggle for Protective Labor Legislation in Pennsylvania
| By the early twentieth century, Pennsylvania was a major industrial state where tens of thousands of women were employed in factories, sweatshops, stores, and tenement home establishments. Rapid industrialization often led to widespread abuses and harsh working conditions, and attempts to organize women into labor unions met with limited success. As a result, Progressive reformers in the state increasingly turned to the enactment of protective labor legislation as a means to improve the lives of women workers. |
1
|
|
In Pennsylvania, as in other industrialized states in the Northeast, local and state chapters of the National Consumers' League (NCL) and the Women's Trade Union League (WTUL) spearheaded these efforts. Members of these groups conducted studies and issued reports, helped draft legislation, and lobbied state legislators in attempts to secure the passage of maximum hours and minimum wage bills. The odds were formidable in a state long dominated by the machine rule of Republican Party bosses and, in the words of one historian, with a "high degree of industrial feudalism."1 Social justice activists also encountered resistance from male labor unions wary of having their strength undercut. After World War I, opposition arose from militant feminists who supported the Equal Rights Amendment, antifeminists who equated the work of social feminists with international communism, and some women workers who did not favor restrictions such as night hours that limited their options and ability to compete with men. Further, Progressive reformers faced the continuous threat of having any successful legislation overturned in a judicial system whose conservative members generally considered liberty of contract inviolable and later determined that women could no longer be viewed as a special class.2 |
2
|
|
At war's end, expanded job opportunities for women and ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, which granted women the right to vote, led many Progressive reformers to expect further gains for women workers. Many activists became astute politicians. Cornelia Bryce Pinchot, a noted suffragist and labor sympathizer, took a leading role in Pennsylvania. With the election of her husband, Gifford Pinchot, as governor of Pennsylvania in 1922, reformers seemed poised to secure passage of maximum hours and minimum wage bills. Yet, the challenges proved to be insurmountable and reformers had limited success. During the second Pinchot administration (1931–35), the Great Depression worsened already harsh working conditions for women and reinvigorated efforts for reform. Cornelia Bryce Pinchot and her allies capitalized on the new political climate and worked with the governor to publicize the plight of working women through such mediums as the Sweatshop Commission. They also laid the foundation for reform legislation enacted during Pennsylvania's Little New Deal. |
3
|
|
The struggle for protective labor legislation in the early twentieth century was connected to a number of important historical phenomena: the transformation of women's work into wage labor; the tension between women's roles in the family and outside wage-earning work; the rise of welfare programs aimed at certain women and children; and the development of gender-based labor legislation. Though historians have written much on the topic of protective labor legislation, there is scant literature on efforts to enact reforms in Pennsylvania, despite its status as a major industrial state.3 To begin to fill this void, this article analyzes the contributions of a small but ardent group of activists who agitated on behalf of women workers, with particular attention paid to their influence on Pennsylvania's Little New Deal. Although Cornelia Bryce Pinchot and her allies did not realize immediate enactment of women's labor laws during the 1920s, they heightened awareness of the issues and opened other avenues to influence policymaking. As such, Progressivism in Pennsylvania survived and evolved beyond World War I and into the 1930s.4 |
. . . |
There are about 13639 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|
