You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the Journal of World History online. About 204 words from this article are provided below; about 500 words remain.
 
If you are a subscriber to the Journal of World History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of World History, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of World History.

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to the journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Journal of World History, 16.1 | The History Cooperative
16.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
Journal of World History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Great War: An Imperial History. By JOHN H. MORROW JR. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. 352 + xvi pp. $43.95.

      The genesis of The Great War: An Imperial History lies in the author's efforts to impart a sense of the profound impact the First World War has exerted on the lives of his American students, who, he laments, know little of the conflict. Generally speaking, the result is eminently suited for undergraduate teaching, a survey that attempts to "tie it all together"—from roots to aftermath—by drawing on the latest insights into not just the war's military and diplomatic but also its economic, social, and cultural elements. In a historiography the author decries for its Eurocentrism, Morrow's persistence in exploring the colonial aspects of the war—and the impact of the predatory imperialism of the belle époque as a critical cause—constitutes one of the book's strengths. He is also to be admired for rejecting the still pervasive popular—and simplistic—view that the war was a cruel, tragic absurdity. "The European powers went to war to determine who would control Europe and the world," he writes. "The stakes proved enormous, and the statesmen and generals ... were no innocents" (p. 36). . . .

There are about 500 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.