You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the JGA online. About 257 words from this article are provided below; about 617 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of the Gilded Age (1.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Review | Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive era, 5.3 | The History Cooperative
5.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
July, 2006
Previous
Next
Journal of Gilded Age and Progressive era

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Book Reviews

New Bottles, Old Wine: The Lost Political Culture of the Gilded Age


SUMMERS, MARK WAHLGREN. Party Games: Getting, Keeping, and Using Power in Gilded Age Politics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. xiv + 352 pp. Preface, coda, illustrations, bibliography, notes, index. $59.95 (cloth), ISBN 0-8078-2862-9; $22.95 (paper), ISBN 0-8078-5537-5.

      Gilded Age and Reconstruction history share a common trait in having to persevere against the tyranny of historiography. Yet while the Civil Rights Movement made untenable the Dunning School's racist interpretation of Reconstruction, no such revolution took place within the wider world of Gilded Age history. For historians writing at the turn of the last century, the Gilded Age was a period where economic interests dominated the political process, where corruption was rife, and sectionalism prevented the natural process of conciliation. New Deal era historians such as Matthew Josephson and Paul Buck only reinforced these assumptions. For historians of the pre-1945 era, the villains of the piece were Republicans. Yet while historical writing of an earlier era stigmatized Republican economic policies, it was the Republican insistence on African American political equality that marked them as political extremists and opportunists. Still, Republican political competitors did not fare much better, and the substance and structure of Gilded Age politics seemed simply a bad era that was eventually redeemed by the Progressive movement. While Gilded Age historians in the last sixty years have made considerable process in revising the dated picture of the Gilded Age, the old template still has managed to survive. . . .

There are about 617 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.