You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the JGA online. About 372 words from this article are provided below; about 8082 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Journal of the Gilded Age, you can:
• subscribe here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of the Gilded Age (1.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Sally M. Miller | For White Men Only: The Socialist Party of America and Issues of Gender, Ethnicity and Race | Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 2.3 | The History Cooperative
2.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
July, 2003
Previous
Next
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


For White Men Only: The Socialist
Party of America and Issues
of Gender, Ethnicity and Race

Sally M. Miller 1
University of the Pacific



     This article examines the experience of distinct groups within the Socialist Party of America, considering the period from its founding in 1901 to the eve of World War One. The Socialist Party, befitting its membership in the international socialist movement of that era, was committed to representing the workers of the world in the Marxist struggle to achieve political and economic equality within a cooperative commonwealth. Accordingly, variables of gender, ethnicity and race were subsumed within the Social Question. Ideally, workers in every capacity and of all backgrounds would march together under the Red Flag and create a new egalitarian society. While, indeed, many lawyers, ministers and others of the middle-class belonged to the Socialist Party and often held office within it, thereby derisively being likened by critics to an assemblage of dentists, the party was very much working class in composition, as shown by James R. Green and others.2

1

     The Socialist Party in its official statement, offered a gender-free and colorblind invitation to membership. Reflecting the policies of the Socialist International, it endorsed equal civil and political rights for men and women. While the two major political parties in the United States had not yet endorsed female suffrage, the Socialist Party's constitution favored equal political rights without regard to gender, and it elected women to offices and to convention delegations, again in contrast to the Republican and Democratic parties. The socialists were undoubtedly influenced in their pioneering position on gender equity by the fact that since the founding conference of the Second International, in 1889, international socialism had endorsed rights for women. Moreover, and of fundamental importance, Marx and Engels themselves had called socialists' attention to the exploitation of women in capitalist societies. Eugene Debs, the party's perennial standard-bearer and often seen to embody it to public opinion, echoed their views, and wrote that the socialist movement was the first to "pledge itself unqualifiedly to abrogate. . .The injustice of sex distinction in reference to the rights, privileges and opportunities of civic and social life."3

2
. . .


There are about 8082 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.