You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 192 words from this article are provided below; about 399 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 96.2 | The History Cooperative
96.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. By Matthew Connelly. (Cambridge: Belknap, 2008. xvi, 521 pp. $35.00, ISBN 978-0-674-02423-6.)

Matthew Connelly's Fatal Misconception is a powerful historical work both for those who are new to the subject of global population policy in the twentieth century and for scholars, who can rely on his body of evidence and valuable perspective. His dedication to archival research, primary source documents, and prior works by historians makes the book particularly strong. 1
      Beginning in the second half of the nineteenth century, Western imperial powers feared rising populations in the East. In addition, race theorists and social Darwinists warned of the degeneration of humanity if lesser specimens continued to breed and mix into the gene pool. Related concerns, if more modern in form, continued for more than one hundred years. While other scholars have successfully addressed these developments, adding to the body of literature in their respective areas, Connelly's work is more comprehensive. Furthermore, he does not stop at contextualizing the sentiment in favor of population control. He clearly outlines the continual steps that were taken to "remake humanity" (p. 15). . . .

There are about 399 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.