You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 160 words from this article are provided below; about 371 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 96.1 | The History Cooperative
96.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Devil of the Domestic Sphere: Temperance, Gender, and Middle-Class Ideology, 1800–1860. By Scott C. Martin. (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2008. xii, 204 pp. $38.00, ISBN 978-0-87580-385-2.)

Scott C. Martin's cultural study places gender and class ideology at the center of the antebellum temperance movement. Through textual analysis of movement literature, Devil of the Domestic Sphere portrays temperance as the instrument of a nascent middle class struggling for status and stability. Temperance reformers hoped to secure worldly success by disavowing alcohol and espousing a gender ideology that cast women as domestic guardians and men as their protectors and providers. Women found in this ideology an invitation to act as moral arbiters, but, according to Martin, the gender binary of the temperance movement advantaged men more than women. Indeed, he sees in temperance a persistent strain of misogyny, evident in the questions men raised about women's virtue and moral efficacy and in efforts to limit women's activism. . . .

There are about 371 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.