You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 158 words from this article are provided below; about 423 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 96.1 | The History Cooperative
96.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Drawing the Line at the Big Ditch: The Panama Canal Treaties and the Rise of the Right. By Adam Clymer. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008. x, 286 pp. $29.95, ISBN 978-0-7006-1582-7.)

In this well-written and insightful book, Adam Clymer makes the case for reexamining, in March and April of 1978, the ratification of the treaties that relinquished United States control of the Panama Canal and the surrounding Canal Zone. According to Clymer, this episode was an "overlooked turning point in American political history" in which conservatism established itself as the dominant political ideology in the United States (p. x). 1
      Clymer succeeds in shedding new light on the story but ultimately fails in proving its wider political significance. He deserves special credit for his rich portrayal of many colorful political figures. He draws on letters and archival sources, but especially on personal interviews, from which he has collected dozens of pithy quotes. . . .

There are about 423 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.