You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 171 words from this article are provided below; about 363 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.4 | The History Cooperative
95.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review




The Deepest South: The United States, Brazil, and the African Slave Trade. By Gerald Horne. (New York: New York University Press, 2007. 341 pp. Cloth, $75.00, ISBN 978-0-8147-3688-3. Paper, $24.00, ISBN 978-0-8147-3689-0.)

The United States and Brazil dominated slavery in the Americas in the mid-nineteenth century. Each had reached its position as a dominant slave power by different routes. The United States had done so initially under British rule, through the cultivation of tobacco, rice, and ultimately cotton, and—though an importer of enslaved African labor—largely through the natural reproduction of captive people. Brazil, by contrast, was a former colony of Portugal, depended heavily on imported captive labor from the sixteenth century onward, and largely employed those captives in cultivating sugar and, by the nineteenth century, coffee. Despite their different historical trajectories as slave powers, Gerald Horne argues, the two nations became closely intertwined in the promotion and defense of slavery internationally in the nineteenth century in the face of persistent British efforts to suppress the African slave trade. . . .

There are about 363 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.