You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 128 words from this article are provided below; about 372 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.4 | The History Cooperative
95.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Fugitive Vision: Slave Image and Black Identity in Antebellum Narrative. By Michael A. Chaney. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008. xiv, 254 pp. $39.95, ISBN 978-0-253-34944-6.)

Popular representations of slaves among both abolitionists and apologists evoked a tangle of conflicting identifications for ex-slave authors. The widespread emblems of the supplicant slave, the ragtag runaway, and the abused slave woman suggested a closed set of choices for antebellum identity: either as white/–master/abuser/father/voyeur/reader or as black/slave/victim/mother/object/brute. Michael A. Chaney argues that as ex-slave authors tenuously inhabited both of those contrary positions, they found them intolerable and engineered ways of disembodying and disconnecting the conventions. Through tiny narrative shocks, they revealed to their audience its own expectations and thereby worked to undo the mass of stereotypes informing those expectations. . . .

There are about 372 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.