You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 142 words from this article are provided below; about 407 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.4 | The History Cooperative
95.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



All Honor to Jefferson? The Virginia Slavery Debates and the Positive Good Thesis. By Erik S. Root. (Lanham: Lexington, 2008. viii, 255 pp. Cloth, $75.00, ISBN 978-0-7391-2217-4. Paper, $32.95, ISBN 978-0-7391-2218-1.)

Erik S. Root's All Honor to Jefferson? is a forcefully argued book that examines the "public debate" over bondage in Virginia "between the Founding and the Civil War" (p. 2). Wishing "to elucidate the moral controversy over slavery," Root argues that the state's founders were dedicated emancipationists who believed in the principles of natural rights and that slavery had to be eliminated (ibid.). By the late 1820s, however, a new generation of leaders, driven by "self-interest" (p. 108), rejected emancipation and turned to the "positive good" theory, most famously articulated by Thomas Roderick Dew, a professor at William and Mary College in the 1820s and 1830s. . . .

There are about 407 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.