You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 160 words from this article are provided below; about 372 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.4 | The History Cooperative
95.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Yamasee War: A Study of Culture, Economy, and Conflict in the Colonial South. By William L. Ramsey. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008. xii, 307 pp. $50.00, ISBN 978-0-8032-3972-2.)

The Yamasee War (1715–1718) ended the Indian slave trade, brought about the collapse of proprietary government in South Carolina, strengthened Spanish and French prospects in the region, and encouraged the development of powerful Indian confederacies including the Creek and Catawba nations. Although the conflict plays a central role in two major works on the early South, Verner Crane's The Southern Frontier, 1670–1732 (1929) and Alan Gallay's The Indian Slave Trade (2002), it remains understudied and, according to William L. Ramsey, misunderstood. In explaining the war's origins, Crane and Gallay cite several factors but place most of the blame on Carolina's lawless traders. Ramsey argues that such an explanation fails to capture the complex motives that drove English and Indian actions at each phase of the conflict. . . .

There are about 372 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.