You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 175 words from this article are provided below; about 379 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.4 | The History Cooperative
95.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2009
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Origins of Proslavery Christianity: White and Black Evangelicals in Colonial and Antebellum Virginia. By Charles F. Irons. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2008. xiv, 366 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 978-0-8078-3194-6. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-0-8078-5877-6.)

Charles F. Irons's excellently researched and strongly argued book fills in gaps in the scholarship on the connections between proslavery and southern biracial churches. Focusing on Virginia, a key state in size and leadership of the religious proslavery movement, Irons traces the interplay between the evolution of biracial evangelicalism and the proslavery argument. Few studies have placed proslavery in the context of southern religious institutions. Historians instead cast evangelical proslavery in the context of sectional dispute. By shifting attention to southern churches, Irons is able to describe functional proslavery in the eighteenth century and early national period, both of which are often ignored in favor of the post-1831 period of sectional dispute. But as this study demonstrates, white evangelicals' perceptions of slavery were molded by their day-to-day interactions with slaves in their own congregations. . . .

There are about 379 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.