You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 200 words from this article are provided below; about 389 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.3 | The History Cooperative
95.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



When Prayer Fails: Faith Healing, Children, and the Law. By Shawn Francis Peters. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. x, 262 pp. $29.95, ISBN 978-0-19-530635-4.)

Shawn Francis Peters has written a concise book on a compelling topic: the legal prosecutions of parents whose reliance solely on religious healing resulted in the deaths of their children. The author examines a substantial number of cases that have come before the courts in the last century and a half, beginning with the Peculiar People, a sect in mid-nineteenth-century England, and ending with the 2004 conviction of a Milwaukee minister who suffocated a boy during a church ritual intended to rid him of autism. While differing in time, place, and specific circumstances, the cases raise issues of fundamental individual rights that have vexed the courts, state legislatures, and the public. At center stage is a question: Is the state's primary duty to protect the religious liberty of parents or to safeguard the welfare of their children? As Peters's careful exploration makes clear, the answers are often painstakingly arrived at, the precedents set in one case are not easily applicable to others that follow, and, consequently, the case law remains confusing. . . .

There are about 389 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.