You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 138 words from this article are provided below; about 350 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.3 | The History Cooperative
95.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



"Let a Common Interest Bind Us Together": Associations, Partisanship, and Culture in Philadelphia, 1775–1840. By Albrecht Koschnik. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2007. xiv, 351 pp. $45.00, ISBN 978-0-8139-2648-3.)

Although party politics today is as American as apple pie, many founding-era Americans feared that the emergence of party loyalties would prove divisive and ultimately destroy the republic. George Washington warned Americans against parties in his farewell address in 1796: "The alternate domination of one faction over another," he wrote, "sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension ... is itself a frightful despotism." Yet Washington's own cabinet divided over issues both foreign and domestic. While some scholars argue that these divisions shaped the first party system, others assert that Republicans and Federalists in that era did not behave as true political parties. . . .

There are about 350 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.