You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 366 words from this article are provided below; about 739 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Previews | The Journal of American History, 95.2 | The History Cooperative
95.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
 


Previews





The defense of states' rights by white southerners in the post–World War II era has long been understood as a strategy to prevent federal interference with racial segregation. By tracing the relocation of the Alexander Smith Carpet Company from Yonkers, New York, to Greenville, Mississippi, in the early 1950s, Tami J. Friedman shows that upholding states' rights had economic as well as racial connotations. The argument for states' rights appealed to northern businessmen seeking favorable investment climates as well as to southern boosters who hoped industrialization would help preserve their region's racial and political status quo. This essay explores how a shared commitment to capital migration united northern and southern leaders across regional boundaries, increasing the vulnerability of workers and communities to corporate power on both sides of the North-South divide.

 
Following the publication of Alfred C. Kinsey's two most famous works—Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953)— his critics branded him as a foe of traditional religion and an enemy of American Christian values. Kinsey's disdain for what he saw as outdated religious moralizing about issues such as premarital and homosexual sex is apparent, but, R. Marie Griffith shows, he had ties to important liberal Protestant leaders. By exploring Kinsey's correspondence with members of the clergy and tracing the work on sexual issues that many of those religious leaders pursued after his death, Griffith analyzes Kinsey's impact on religious ideas about sex in both liberal and conservative religious circles. Seeing Kinsey's influence on religious liberals helps us rethink the complicated relationship between religion and sexuality, and the so-called culture wars, in recent U.S. history.

 
What does increasing interest in the multidisciplinary study of the senses have to offer historians? This Journal of American History round table, guest edited by Mark M. Smith, offers essays by Smith, Gerard J. Fitzgerald and Gabriella M. Petrick, Connie Y. Chiang, Richard Cullen Rath, James W. Cook, and David Howes that acquaint readers with the historiography of touch, taste, smell, sound, and sight. The essays offer case studies suggestive of how historians might attend to the senses in their own work.

 
. . .

There are about 739 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.