You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 183 words from this article are provided below; about 420 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.2 | The History Cooperative
95.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Class and the Color Line: Interracial Class Coalition in the Knights of Labor and the Populist Movement. By Joseph Gerteis. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007. x, 274 pp. Cloth, $84.95, ISBN 978-0-8223-4210-6. Paper, $23.95, ISBN 978-0-8223-4224-3.)

In the long debate over C. Vann Woodward's "forgotten alternatives" in the years between Reconstruction and the start of disfranchisement and segregation, the interracial organizing efforts of the Knights of Labor and the Populist Party have long intrigued historians (Howard N. Rabinowitz, "More Than the Woodward Thesis," Journal of American History, Dec. 1988, pp. 842–56). The sociologist Joseph Gerteis offers a fresh analysis of those social, economic, and ultimately political movements by comparing the two organizations in Georgia and Virginia, with special emphasis on Atlanta and Richmond. 1
      Class-oriented, the Knights and the Populists nevertheless spanned several economic strata. They portrayed themselves as working people, comparing wage labor and tenant farming to slavery. As "producers of wealth," they clung to a republican belief in civic virtue (p. 5). Citizenship, democratic participation, and social status characterized the fundamental assumptions underlying both movements. . . .

There are about 420 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.