You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 148 words from this article are provided below; about 378 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 95.2 | The History Cooperative
95.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Civil War and the Limits of Destruction. By Mark E. Neely Jr. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007. 277 pp. $27.95, ISBN 978-0-674-02658-2.)

In a popular fable, a traveler feeds hungry villagers by putting a rock into a pot and convincing them all to contribute to a hearty "stone soup." In 1991, Mark E. Neely Jr. dropped a boulder into the Civil War cauldron when he asked: "Was the Civil War a total war?" Such questions often yield discussions about definitions rather than history, about absolutes instead of nuance. But the total war question has produced spirited debates about the true nature of the Civil War. In this slim volume Neely returns to that terrain, arguing that historians have exaggerated the destructiveness of the Civil War, accepting a sensationalized version of the conflict that distracts from a dispassionate understanding of the war's true meaning. . . .

There are about 378 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.