You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 162 words from this article are provided below; about 279 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.4 | The History Cooperative
94.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2008
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Kansas in the Great Depression: Work Relief, the Dole, and Rehabilitation. By Peter Fearon. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2007. xviii, 316 pp. $44.95, ISBN 978-0-8262-1736-3.)

Peter Fearon's Kansas in the Great Depression is a careful, systematic discussion of the coming of the New Deal to Republican Kansas. Despite the state's long-established conservatism, relief programs worked remarkably well in Kansas, often better than in other parts of the country. That can be attributed to features unique to the state: relatively few unemployed workers, a comparatively homogenous population, and a large population served by the federal farm program, which did not rely heavily on relief funds. The state also benefited from high quality relief administration and a somewhat compassionate response to the problems of the unemployed, whether local or transients. Although the system did not work perfectly, especially in the particularly needy southeastern corner of the state, it seems to have worked as well as could have been expected. . . .

There are about 279 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.