You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 199 words from this article are provided below; about 381 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.2 | The History Cooperative
94.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



American Fear: The Causes and Consequences of High Anxiety. By Peter N. Stearns. (New York: Routledge, 2006. xii, 243 pp. Cloth, $95.00, ISBN 978-0-415-95540-9. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-0-415-95542-3.)

Peter N. Stearns, the pioneering historian of emotions, has written a timely book that historicizes the post-9/11 climate of fear in the United States. In American Fear, Stearns argues that "we have come, as a nation, to fear excessively," and he seeks to explain why this is so (p. 19). 1
      Historical and cross-cultural comparisons bear out the distinctiveness of modern American fear, according to Stearns. Using interviews, personal recollections, and polling data, he contrasts Americans' responses to Pearl Harbor with their responses to 9/11 and concludes that they "were over three times as likely to be afraid" after 9/11 and that "the level of their fear, when expressed, ran much deeper" (p. 36). He then compares Americans' reactions to the terrorist attacks with Spanish reactions to the Madrid train bombings in 2004 and British reactions to the London subway and bus bombings in 2005 and asserts that for Europeans anger and "a defiant sense of unity and determination quickly predominated" over fear (p. 48). . . .

There are about 381 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.