You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 241 words from this article are provided below; about 361 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 94.2 | The History Cooperative
94.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Building New Deal Liberalism: The Political Economy of Public Works, 1933–1956. By Jason Scott Smith. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. xvi, 283 pp. $75.00, ISBN 0-521-82805-8.)

Jason Scott Smith's intention in Building New Deal Liberalism is nothing less than to reinterpret the New Deal's public works' programs and reorient our understanding of the New Deal's political economy. Neither liberal nor left interpretations, Smith believes, have merit. The former's critique, that public works spending was too timid and thus failed to achieve its purpose of solving the unemployment crisis, and the latter's, that the spending was merely temporizing and a sop, are both inadequate. The public works programs had purposes more profound than simply alleviating unemployment or promoting recovery. They were intended, and succeeded, as the means for building up the nation's infrastructure. Public works spending, the author argues, whether through the Public Works Administration (PWA) or the Works Progress Administration (WPA), was never intended to be merely the remedy for unemployment. Rather, it was meant to be the instrument of economic development. That intention, the author argues, was realized during the 1930s and World War II, but was fulfilled even more abundantly in the postwar era when the New Deal's example and tradition led to the creation of the interstate highway system and to other vitally important applications of the principles of state-sponsored capitalism, which, Smith argues, the New Deal had firmly embedded in national policy. . . .

There are about 361 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.