You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 168 words from this article are provided below; about 497 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.4 | The History Cooperative
93.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2007
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History. Ed. by Ann Laura Stoler. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. xx, 544 pp. Cloth, $99.95, ISBN 0-8223-3737-1. Paper, $26.95, ISBN 0-8223-3724-X.)

It is a bit disconcerting to realize that, methodologically speaking, most of the excellent and widely ranging essays in Haunted by Empire could have appeared in such 1990s collections as Nationalisms and Sexualities (ed. Andrew Parker et al., 1992), Cultures of United States Imperialism (ed. Amy Kaplan and Donald E. Pease, 1993), the 1998 "No More Separate Spheres!" special issue of American Literature (ed. Cathy N. Davidson), and even Haunted Bodies: Gender and Southern Texts (ed. Anne Goodwyn Jones and Susan V. Donaldson, 1997). Are postcolonial theorists and literary critics, who have been using Michel Foucault since before most of our present-day undergraduates were born, really that far in front of historians? More disturbingly, has American studies stalled out, with the best boomers in the business still writing elaborate footnotes to Amy Kaplan? . . .

There are about 497 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.