| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 196 words from this article are provided below; about 356 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

The Big Vote: Gender, Consumer Culture, and the Politics of Exclusion, 1890s–1920s. By Liette Gidlow. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004. xiv, 260 pp. $45.00, ISBN 0-8018-7864-0.)
Every election we are bombarded with nonpartisan campaigns urging us to vote; I once saw these ubiquitous efforts as ineffective but innocuous. Since I read Liette Gidlow's able and thought-provoking book, The Big Vote, however, I look at them quite differently.	1
Gidlow examines the Get Out the Vote (GOTV) campaigns of the 1920s, demonstrating that the campaigns were ubiquitous and, as far as increasing voter turnout, ineffective. But Gidlow also argues that the GOTV campaigns strengthened the political dominance of the campaign activists—white middle-class clubwomen and businessmen. Gidlow defines political dominance to mean, first, the ability to frame public debate. She contends that while Americans were shocked at the low voter turnout in 1920, GOTV activists reframed the issue by arguing that the recalcitrant yet valuable voters were affluent whites rather than workers or people of color. This belief became the political wisdom of the era, despite scientific studies that had identified upper- and middle-class whites as those most likely to vote.	. . .

There are about 356 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.