You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 267 words from this article are provided below; about 365 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.2 | The History Cooperative
93.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Around the Family Altar: Domesticity in the African Methodist Episcopal Church, 1865–1900. By Julius H. Bailey. (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2005. xii, 151 pp. $59.95, ISBN 0-8130-2842-6.)

With this slim volume, Julius H. Bailey has skillfully handled a large topic, "domesticity" and the nineteenth-century African American family. Centering his analysis on the African Methodist Episcopal Church (AME), Bailey brought new insight to the examination of the denomination's idea of the Christian home. Arguing first that there were "two interconnected uses of domesticity in the AME church," Bailey contended that various constituents within the ame vied for the ascendancy of their version of domesticity (p. 3). One group placed primacy on child rearing as a means to race advancement. Here Bailey broke new ground by exploring the previously unexamined emphasis on proper child rearing in black families as an avenue to "respectability." The second group underscored the difficulty black women faced in their attempts to assert themselves in the AME church and in other places outside the "private sphere," and they highlighted the inherent gendered nature of domesticity. For Bailey, the construction of domesticity relied as much on conceptions of manhood and masculinity as on femininity and the home world of the black woman. African American men had a direct stake in the construction of domesticity, and the way it functioned in the family influenced their experiences as men in the wider world. Throughout the nineteenth century, the "marketplace of ideas" (p. 4) regarding the home and the proper roles for black men, women, and children constituted "a black domestic ideology" (p. 6). . . .

There are about 365 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.