You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 222 words from this article are provided below; about 385 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.2 | The History Cooperative
93.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Evolution of American Ecology, 1890–2000. By Sharon E. Kingsland. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005. xii, 313 pp. $50.00, ISBN 0-8018-8171-4.)

Almost fifty years ago, Samuel Hays argued in Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency (1959) that a wave of federal legislation and reform passed during the Progressive Era to conserve the nation's forests, fields, and streams was not the result of a democratic impulse to protect the people's interests. Instead, Hays viewed the conservation movement as symptomatic of a growing faith in, and reliance on, the ability of scientific experts to rationally manage and control economic and social forces in American society. Since the publication of Hays's classic work, environmental historians have built on and challenged its thesis. Much of that revisionist scholarship has attended closely to the ways in which a wide range of actors— from wealthy sportsmen to subsistence hunters, from New England farmers to Native Americans—were affected by and drove both historical changes in the land and the efforts to regulate and govern the use of resources. In The Evolution of American Ecology 1890–2000, Sharon E. Kingsland adds ecologists to that expanding cast of characters. Ecological science, she argues, was a by-product of "the same economic imperatives and the same need to rationalize resource use that supported the conservation movement" (p. 4). . . .

There are about 385 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.